Long long ago, someone made a credit entry for a Kurt Sissert - not even close to my name. But it was enough for one of the credit companies to return two scores for one SSN - a good score (for my real name), and a zero for good old Kurt Sissert. It turns out that the underwriter pulled the wrong number. Really, they're supposed to take a closer look, but they didn't.
The other one still fell afoul of the "low credit activity" thing, because I've only been using debit cards for the last six months. But, after me coming down on my broker and a lot of phone calls, we were able to pull it through.
I sign on Monday, I think, but we went ahead and made a rental agreement, so I spent my first day in the house today. Hooray! Possessions get moved over in a couple of days. Turns out I might be a homeowner by my birthday (Friday) after all!
Geek details: I decided to use Comcast for cable internet, with an Airport for wireless, and Vonage for my phone service. I got that all working today.
Great writing. I could read a book on this stuff.
I don't know how to solve it. If a group of passionate people unconnected to a campaign wants to put an ad on television, they should be able to do so. Maybe the penalties for lies should have more teeth somehow. Maybe there should be a vetting process. What stops up from putting up an ad up saying Bush ran from his responsibilities on 9/11 and tried to order Air Force One to Mexico, hid under his seat, cried for his Mommy the whole time, and tried to call up Osama to give our unconditional surrender? That's about the best parallel I can find. I really don't believe it happened like that, but any evidence otherwise could easily be spun as his defenders just playing politics and lying for him. It's ridiculous.
It's not the 527's that are the problem. It's the lies.
By the way, some people are saying that Bush ran from his responsibilities on 9/11 and tried to order Air Force One to Mexico, hid under his seat, cried for his Mommy the whole time, and tried to call up Osama to give our unconditional surrender. Why isn't the press asking George Bush about this? It really makes you wonder. Bush needs to address this scandalous charge.
Wolf Blitzer is a friend of mine on CNN. He’d asked me three weeks in a row to come on the program. I ducked him. I finally said, “OK, I’ll go.” I knew what he wanted to ask me.More evidence of Blitzer being biased...
Today, my loan got declined.
Three years ago I had a fair amount of debt. I came out of college in '95 with student loans, several thousand in credit card debt, and a car loan. I had a job in California and had moved out of state to telecommute in an effort to have lower living expenses and get ahead with my money. After a few years, I was finally getting over the hump. I remember when I finally paid off the last of my debt, and then I was surprised at how relatively easy everything felt afterward, due to interest working for you instead of against you.
I basically let my credit cards rot because I was so sick of the games they play - charging you finance if you're late by a couple of days, charging you finance even if you pay your credit card in full, because of the interest that builds up while your check is in transit. My cards were paid off, my loans were paid off, and I owned my truck. I liked it that way.
For the last two years I have lived off of my debit card, with the exception of when I bought my laptop - I paid that off the next month.
My credit ratings have consistently been above 800, which is close to maximum. But on the final spot-check for the loan, they ran my credit again, and two of the reports came back blank. They were blank because I hadn't had much recent credit activity. So, my loan got declined.
In other words, this bank is not allowing me to buy a house, because I am too good with my money.
They're setting me up with another loan with higher interest rates that I can't refinance for three years. That's an extra $120/month. I guess I am high-risk because I pay off my debts. What a fucking stupid system.
Where do you nominate post of the year? Josh Marshall hits the nail on the head here, and it's almost physically relieving to read it. When an author is able to reframe an issue into something that just fits and clicks, and also happens to be correct, it makes things fall into place. Go read the post - he really gets going about halfway through.
One thing I hate is when one blog quotes a really long entry from another blog, all in their blockquote box, repeating their point, and then simply says "Indeed." at the bottom. It's such puffery. As if by their mere repetition and approval, they bestow even more wisdom onto the quoted material. Every time I read it, it comes across as pretentious self-aggrandizement. Why even say it? Why not just leave the quote as-is? Let it stand, or contribute to the thought, don't place yourself out in front with nothing. What is the possible motivation in saying "Indeed." and nothing else? I think it's a foolproof way to tell the difference between a thinker and a poser.Indeed.
John Titor was a supposed time traveler from the year 2036 who came back to the year 2000/2001 and left several internet bulletin board postings about who he was, how time travel was possible, and several vague bits of news about what would happen over the next few years. Among his predictions:
- John gave technical details about his time machine that involved the use of mini-black holes. He stated that CERN would make an announcement pertaining to this within a year after he discussed it. In the fall of 2001, after John left, CERN issued a press release indicating the possibility of creating mini-black holes was realistic.
- John stated the IBM 5100 computer had special abilities that were unpublished by IBM. Numerous IBM engineers have come forward to confirm this claim.
- John made numerous comments about Constitutional and civil rights changing in the United States.
- John stated that Mad Cow disease would arrive and be downplayed in the United States.
- John stated that WMDs would not be found in Iraq years before a second war was even a possibility.
- John stated that the Olympics would be canceled after 2004.
Whoa!
The Washington Post completed an investigation into the swift boat accounts. Frustratingly, they use an even-handed tone in saying that both parties are withholding information, but the facts in the article disprove several SBVT allegations and don't disprove anything that the Kerry campaign holds to be true.
But here's the other thing that bothers me. What this really comes down to is the SBVT saying that Kerry misrepresented Vietnam veterans after the war - distorted the truth, etc. I just don't get that. What is their theory of his motivation for doing so? Why would he just make up things like that? I think that's where this falls apart; the argument about how many Vietnam veterans and commanders took part in war crimes. These SBVT are protesting against that allegation still because it is such an ugly truth, and so difficult to hear. The problem is that it doesn't mean it's not true, and they haven't offered forward a convincing motivation for Kerry to risk what he risked back then, just to make up stories. I think their problem is more that they believe that it was an abomination that he told the truth.
There's this whole stupid subdynamic about how Kerry's allegations back in 1971 dishonored every veteran; that if he mentioned that some soldiers or commanders were participating in war crimes, that it brought dishonor on every soldier (even though Kerry was clear that he wasn't speaking on behalf of all veterans or making accusations against all veterans). I understand that when you're in the active forces, you need to adopt the attitude that what is true for one is true for all, because it saves lives. But you'd think that they'd take a broader view after going home. Any time these men still make this argument that Kerry somehow dishonored any soldier that has ever put on a uniform, they do nothing except to undermine their own point and expose their own biases.
The kid will be a guest on Leno or vault over some dead body on "Law & Order" this fall.
Oh well. I guess she went to the Olympics to win, not to make his job easy...
But if you can specify dependencies, then you could set it to only show you the todo items that you are enabled to do. Then when you cross one off, it would be replaced by the items that you are then enabled to do.
So I have a system like that now. It's not hierarchical; the todo items can have multiple parents, and multiple children.
And what's cool about it is that it generates clickable bubble graphs. Here's an example of my current list:
In the application, you can click on any of the bubbles to go to the page for that todo item.
So if you'd like to try it out, drop me a note. It uses the same membership database as my Checkin System.
Caption:
An unidentified supporter of President Bush tries to silence protester Kendra Lloyd-Knox (right) outside Southridge High School in Beaverton. Elsewhere in Portland, supporters of Democratic candidate Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., rallied on the waterfront.
Now, I have a bunch of music, but I have always had a serious bias towards music that wants me to hook into it and truly listen to it and feel it. A lot of modern classical music, a lot of singer-songwriter music that I have a personal connection to, etc. Even the instrumental jazz I have is a bit too interesting to fade into the background. All that means is that I don't have a very huge library of background music or study music.
Complicating that is that normal "background music" suuuucks. Easy listening, no way. New age, nope. I don't really even like techno because it makes me feel a bit too much like a geek.
Right now I only have two albums that are awesome for programming. One is Philip Glass' soundtrack to Kundun. The other is Peter Gabriel's Passion, the soundtrack to "Last Temptation Of Christ". Both of them are high quality music that don't demand attention, but help you get into a zone.
Anyone have other suggestions of good music for studying or programming? Given what it seems like I like and don't like?
Okay, I'm probably not going to see it.
But, check out its rating:
'Alien vs. Predator' is rated PG-13 for Violence, Language, Horror Images, Slime and Gore.Oh, they fell afoul of the dreaded SLIME provision! If not for that, they might have had the ultimate prize, PG!
I can't imagine the great agony of a mom or a dad having to make the decision about which child to pick up first on September the 11th. We cannot hesitate, we cannot yield, we must do everything in our power to bring an enemy to justice before they hurt us again.What is this, Sophie's Choice? This has got to be more and more transparent to swing voters.
As a programmer it's my job to take complex requirements and narrow them down to simple concepts. Todo-item software has interested me for a while, and I've always been vaguely dissatisfied with kind of todo software you see in applications like Outlook and Entourage - due dates, percentage-done, etc.
In the background, I've been working on a registration and login system as an excuse to play around with new styles of software architecture. Now that I've finally developed a system that works for me, I'm able to rapidly develop new applications just to try them out.
I've got one of them online now - the app took a day for me to write, although much longer for me to integrate into the registration system and to launch.
It's an effort to explore one way of dealing with ongoing projects. Basically what you do is create a new subject that is an ongoing project. For me, I have things like "Buy House", and "Launch New Website". These are large projects that might not have a set due date, but require many different steps.
Then, within each of those projects, I identify several subdeliverables, and I make status updates. Any time I have news to report, I make a status update to contribute to the historical record of that project. Any time I complete a subdeliverable, I check it off.
Each time I finish with a session, I might update the "checkin" date. If I say two days from now, then the project disappears for two days.
Then basically what I do is I check in to the system whenever I want - sometimes a few times a day. The system checks to see which projects require my attention, and asks for my status updates. When I'm finished with the overdue projects, then it's considered all up to date, and I know I'm caught up with all my projects.
I've used this system for a couple of months now, and it works a lot better for me than any due-date/calendar system, where I'm always adjusting deadline dates and feeling irresponsible for it.
It's online now. It's just a prototype - poor graphic design and badly documented - but it is usable. If you're interested in trying it out and making suggestions, go ahead and drop me a note.
Good. Ever since the Jazzy Jeff and Fresh Prince days, I've always though this man to be one of the most prodigiously talented men in the country. He's been in a bit of a mainstream phase lately, where it's easy to underestimate him, but as an entertainer I've held him in as high estimation as I hold Steve Martin. I think he's really got something intangible in terms of potential. I'd love to see what he could really offer.
Bush announces a terrorist plot on Sunday about financial institutions. People scream about it being politics in response. Bush later says that the plot is corroborated by a third party. Bush names third party. Third party turns out to be a double agent that we had placed inside of Al Q'aida, and Bush just blew his cover.
That's the theory, anyway. If it's true, it is huge. Huge.
Colorado has 9 EV's. States are normally winner-take-all, and a candidate needs 270 EV's to win. Colorado has been pretty solidly for Bush lately, so they've been counting on those EV's.
Each state, however, is allowed to determine how to award those EV's. It doesn't have to be winner-take-all. What Colorado is considering doing is awarding them proportionally. So if Bush gets 55% of the vote and Kerry gets 45% of the vote, Bush would get 5 EVs and Kerry would get 4 EVs.
This could have a huge effect on the election given how close the two candidates have been. Bush only won 2000 by three EVs.
But what makes it even more exciting is that if it makes it on the ballot, which seems likely, we won't know if Colorado's EVs will be awarded proportionally until election night itself! The ballot will be voted on that night, and if it passes, the EVs will be awarded proportionally, and if it doesn't, it will be winner-take-all. This means that even if Colorado is firmly for one candidate or another, Colorado's EV picture could still be tight if the ballot measure results themselves are tight.
Now, is this generally a good idea? I think it is. It enfranchises more voters and gives them more of a voice within a state. Now, if California, a solid Democratic state, were considering it, I'd be a lot more worried, because California is a solidly Democratic state. So I can see how Republicans would be alarmed by this!
What would be a better approach is to have all states switch to this proportional method at once. Perhaps states could pass measures that would say that they would switch to the new method, but only as soon as a set number of other states do as well.
What would be even better is if they allowed fractional EVs. Otherwise, battleground states with an even number of EVs would be quite boring, while battleground states with an odd number of EVs would get all the action.
All in all though, this will have a large effect on future elections. If Colorado becomes proportional, and in future elections it is shown that the vote is pretty close, candidates aren't going to want to spend millions of dollars to fight over one puny EV - when otherwise they'd be fighting over nine.
There are a lot of counties that are going to be using voting systems where there is significant opportunity for fraud that can't be proven afterward.
I started idly thinking about launching a website to publicly track communications with various counties and allow people to post status updates. It turns out some other folks are thinking along the same lines. This is one such site.