In turn, I'm worried that many of us are getting too micro. Focusing on every little failure, throwing thousands of tiny darts - it's a good way to weaken a foundation that deserves to be weakened, but it's also a good way to distract ourselves from larger movements.
It can also be taken advantage of - when we get too micro and too aggressive, it's easy for us to be trapped. Basically any source of information that alludes to a Bush weakness is considered fair game to parrot about and pass around. What are the chances of disinformation that can be knocked down easily later?
I'm concerned because I think there's risk of backfire. I've heard from three different areas of my personal sphere that they think the press is ganging up on Bush. Bush is never going to be seen as the guy that is the source of all the evil machinations of the administration, so it's going to be easier for people to identify with him as an underdog that has been treated unfairly.
The other thing about the micro level is that it distracts us from plans the Bush administration might have in place for the future. One obvious example is the Saddam trial. Is this trial going to happen during election season?
Why is it that no one seems very concerned with Bush's environmental policies? To me this is way more important an issue than conspiracy theories about WMD and 9/11. If people were maybe more in tune with what has been done by Bush to reverse the US's environmental policies then how could they possibly vote for him. I think the truth is that Democrats AND Republicans do not give a shit.
Just an Earth Day rant.
http://www.earthfirst.org/forestthinning.htm
Posted by: DC Barns at April 22, 2004 10:21 AM