I remember thinking that the book had a lot to say about integrity. There were a lot of character journeys where people did things that were true to themselves and were ostracized for it, and kept doing those things that were true to themselves anyway. There was also a big feeling of "Choose Your Own Destiny", of making your own way, of creating your own future. I don't equate that with republicanism or lack of compassion for others. I think there are four main ingredients to "making your own future":
The problem is that people create a relationship between two concepts:
Imagine someone who feels deficient in one of these areas, and improves it through a motivation of desperation. From a place of tightness. They might end up fixing their vulnerability in their estimation, but they are then in turn more likely to hate or judge against someone who has the same weakness (I'm using the terminology as they would see it). So I think that is why many people believe that someone who has "made good" is by definition not compassionate of those who aren't in the same place. Because it is often true. But, it really doesn't necessarily follow. I don't think the challenge is to make good - I think it's to make good without being desperate about it. It's desperation, not success, that clouds love and compassion.
Anyway, like I said, I haven't read Atlas Shrugged yet. For all I know
it might have 400 pages of moralizing about how some lazy paraplegic
doesn't get off his ass to run a marathon. And I have to admit I
remember some pretty weird stuff stuff in The Foundation about the
protagonist having an affair with someone who really didn't have his
interests at heart, and he knew that, and got involved with her anyway.
I don't know what that has to do with integrity. So this isn't really a
defense of Rand. :)
Posted by Curt at July 25, 2002 08:08 PM