A Voting Summary
I think where I'm ending up on the whole voting thing is:
- Borda is the best method if you can assume that everyone votes
honestly and rationally.
- You can't assume that everyone votes honestly and rationally.
- I'm still confused between Condorcet and Approval, but Condorcet
just seems cooler to me.
I'm still confused on a number of matters, though.
- Condorcet's rankings assume an equidistant preference shift between
each choice. #1 is as much a better choice than #2 is for me as #2 is
to #3. When really, I might be rabid about #1, while #2 and #3 might
just be okay.
- In Borda, #1 has an advantage over #5, five points to one (for five
candidates). In Condorcet, it's just scored as a win.
- I want a voting method that will measure how MUCH you want someone
over another candidate (degree of rabidness), but without having to deal
with all the fear-based voting that could entail (increasing a
second-choice candidate means decreasing the likelihood of the
first-choice candidate).
Posted by Curt at November 8, 2002 01:15 PM